Build enterprise systems without a team of developers.
We teach you how.
Cost to hire one developer per year
Time to build a team and ship features
Dependent on keeping them around
There's a better way.
We help you document your system architecture, APIs, database schema, and constraints in a CLAUDE.md file. This becomes your blueprint for autonomous building.
You learn how to brief Claude CLI what to build. Clear specs → Claude builds exactly what you need. No ambiguity. No rework.
Claude CLI reads your docs, understands the system, and builds features autonomously. Wired, tested, documented. Ready to deploy.
You ship it. Iterate faster. Build more. No hiring. No onboarding. Just Claude building autonomously.
Intelligent compaction monitoring for construction. Real-time analysis, autonomous documentation, live deployment.
✓ 5 modules (Admin, WOLD, Trail, Tools, System)
✓ 1,431 trail objects managed
✓ Complex RBAC (8+ role types)
✓ Supabase + Vercel + Real-time sync
✓ Live in production
Event-driven platform. 14 integrations. PostgreSQL queue. Fully autonomous.
✓ 14 event types (weather, tide, flood warnings, rail delays)
✓ Free API integrations (Open-Meteo, OSRM, Environment Agency)
✓ Async processing with Lambda functions
✓ Standard result envelope for all events
✓ Fully documented for Claude
Both built autonomously using Claude CLI. Both fully deployed and scaling.
An AI coded Frontend
Next.js simplified. Same clean patterns as the backend.
→ Commands layer (clean)
→ Use cases layer (clean)
→ Repository layer (clean)
→ Single entry point envelope
→ Autonomous and extensible
An AI coded Backend
Clean architecture. Single entry point envelope. Consistent patterns throughout.
→ Commands layer (clean)
→ Use cases layer (clean)
→ Repository layer (clean)
→ Single entry point envelope
→ Autonomous and extensible
The Real Cost of AI Hallucination
A developer (Rob) had broken environment setup. Staging, preview, and main branches weren't properly isolated. Different Supabase projects, different Vercel deployments, all tangled together.
But Claude didn't see that.
"Create a brand new project from scratch."
Claude couldn't debug the actual problem. So it defaulted to: "Start fresh. It's cleaner." Claude even wrote two justification documents explaining why recreating was right.
Result: Weeks wasted. Original codebase abandoned. Same problems resurface in the new project.
With a clear CLAUDE.md:
## Environment Setup Three environments: main, staging, develop Each has separate Supabase + Vercel Current issue: staging env vars not syncing To fix: 1. Verify .env files match Supabase refs 2. Check Vercel staging config 3. Run migration 056 on staging DB DO NOT create new projects.
Claude would:
Good documentation = Claude builds right
Bad documentation = Claude hallucinates
Build systems for £5k-20k that would cost £50k-200k to hire engineers for.
Weeks instead of months. Iterate, build, deploy. Repeat.
Good documentation = anyone can understand and build on your system.
Claude can build anything if documented well. No hiring ceiling.